Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 4th District of Alabama (Rep. Robert Aderholt), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 436
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 4th District of Alabama (Rep. Robert Aderholt) totaled $2,129,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Chris J Wallace | Russellville, AL 35654 | $15,464 |
22 | Melvin Oneal Miller | Haleyville, AL 35565 | $14,337 |
23 | Jeffrey M Masterson | Russellville, AL 35653 | $14,322 |
24 | Gary Wayne Addison | Winfield, AL 35594 | $13,617 |
25 | Raymond Larry Aday | Leighton, AL 35646 | $13,485 |
26 | Casey Derrick Raper | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $13,115 |
27 | Robert E Austin | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $12,957 |
28 | Roger D Willingham | Houston, AL 35572 | $12,855 |
29 | Wilburn Mize | Haleyville, AL 35565 | $12,791 |
30 | Mark W Latham | Russellville, AL 35654 | $12,629 |
31 | , | $12,289 | |
32 | Denny L Smith | Double Springs, AL 35553 | $11,715 |
33 | Gary N Dalrymple | Russellville, AL 35654 | $11,493 |
34 | , | $11,399 | |
35 | Danny Hosch | Haleyville, AL 35565 | $11,286 |
36 | James Stephen Porter | Haleyville, AL 35565 | $11,188 |
37 | Rodney Wayne Hudson | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $10,882 |
38 | Harbison Self Storage LLC | Arley, AL 35541 | $10,852 |
39 | Thomas Richardson | Spruce Pine, AL 35585 | $10,773 |
40 | Greg Dalrymple | Tuscumbia, AL 35674 | $10,652 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”