Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 4th District of Alabama (Rep. Robert Aderholt), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 436
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 4th District of Alabama (Rep. Robert Aderholt) totaled $2,129,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Duel B Williams | Guin, AL 35563 | $6,239 |
102 | Milton Ergle | Phil Campbell, AL 35581 | $6,228 |
103 | Stone Branch Cattle Inc. | Phil Campbell, AL 35581 | $6,201 |
104 | Forrest Mccullar | Vinemont, AL 35179 | $6,142 |
105 | Tony Horton | Red Bay, AL 35582 | $6,141 |
106 | Jamie T Summers | Tuscumbia, AL 35674 | $6,084 |
107 | Terry Raper | Phil Campbell, AL 35581 | $6,013 |
108 | Lowell T Brannon | Addison, AL 35540 | $6,003 |
109 | Keith Brumley | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $5,786 |
110 | Jeffery Wayne Martin | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $5,703 |
111 | Michael Smith Morrow | Russellville, AL 35653 | $5,673 |
112 | Bradley Henderson | Double Springs, AL 35553 | $5,672 |
113 | Jerome E Dodd | Haleyville, AL 35565 | $5,628 |
114 | Charles Anthony Baker | Russellville, AL 35654 | $5,620 |
115 | Tim H Pace | Haleyville, AL 35565 | $5,620 |
116 | , | $5,594 | |
117 | Ricky A Nichols | Hodges, AL 35571 | $5,586 |
118 | , | $5,586 | |
119 | Mark Massey | Red Bay, AL 35582 | $5,575 |
120 | , | $5,571 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”