Total Conservation Programs in 7th District of Alabama (Rep. Terri Sewell), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 183
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 7th District of Alabama (Rep. Terri Sewell) totaled $622,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Leonard Holt Moseley | Thomaston, AL 36783 | $3,062 |
62 | Thomas B Smith Jr | Emelle, AL 35459 | $2,943 |
63 | Beeker Catfish & Cattle Farm Inc | Eutaw, AL 35462 | $2,940 |
64 | Ringland Farms LLC | Mountain Brk, AL 35213 | $2,883 |
65 | Roger F Davis | Okeechobee, FL 34972 | $2,717 |
66 | Terri Lovelace | Gallion, AL 36742 | $2,625 |
67 | Mclaughlin Family Trust | Spring Lake, MI 49456 | $2,548 |
68 | W C Farms & Timber Company LLC | Birmingham, AL 35209 | $2,470 |
69 | Leonard D Fitts | Moorestown, NJ 08057 | $2,287 |
70 | Paul Sparkman Jr | Livingston, AL 35470 | $2,270 |
71 | Stratton F Lewis Jr | Sweet Water, AL 36782 | $2,268 |
72 | Bo Davis | Birmingham, AL 35216 | $2,249 |
73 | Double B Of Geiger Corporation | Emelle, AL 35459 | $2,071 |
74 | Alan J Howle | Mountain Brook, AL 35243 | $2,040 |
75 | Freda Brown | Emelle, AL 35459 | $2,034 |
76 | Ira Pruitt Jr | Livingston, AL 35470 | $1,982 |
77 | Bored Well Properties LLC | Livingston, AL 35470 | $1,964 |
78 | Melanie M Hale | Linden, AL 36748 | $1,957 |
79 | Hale Plantation Inc | Tuscaloosa, AL 35406 | $1,947 |
80 | Claude Albert Moseley | Thomaston, AL 36783 | $1,863 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”