Farm Subsidy information
7th District of Alabama
(Rep. Terri Sewell)
Total Subsidies in 7th District of Alabama (Rep. Terri Sewell), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,086
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 7th District of Alabama (Rep. Terri Sewell) totaled $4,916,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mitchell Hall | Demopolis, AL 36732 | $13,684 |
82 | Rose Family LLC | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $13,380 |
83 | Thomas B Smith III | Gainesville, AL 35464 | $13,189 |
84 | Robert Bamberg 111 | Uniontown, AL 36786 | $13,058 |
85 | Epes LLC | Tuscaloosa, AL 35403 | $12,306 |
86 | Allen Waddell | Emelle, AL 35459 | $12,293 |
87 | Roy Etheridge Jr | Thomaston, AL 36783 | $12,192 |
88 | Sims Farms LLC | Faunsdale, AL 36738 | $12,178 |
89 | Reginald Williams | Linden, AL 36748 | $12,111 |
90 | Reach Inc | Eutaw, AL 35462 | $11,957 |
91 | S Allen Clark | Forkland, AL 36740 | $11,953 |
92 | Double Wheel Ranch LLC | Boligee, AL 35443 | $11,820 |
93 | Jimmy Edmonds | Livingston, AL 35470 | $11,746 |
94 | Mrswtk Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $11,745 |
95 | Karl Bruno Trucking | Sweet Water, AL 36782 | $11,687 |
96 | Timothy G Hall | Gallion, AL 36742 | $11,584 |
97 | Stella B Sykes | Tuscaloosa, AL 35402 | $11,568 |
98 | Chester Moore | Dixons Mills, AL 36736 | $11,447 |
99 | Rentz Miller Lewis | Sweet Water, AL 36782 | $11,429 |
100 | David Edmonds | Coatopa, AL 35470 | $11,305 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”