Conservation Reserve Program in 7th District of Alabama (Rep. Terri Sewell), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,252

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 7th District of Alabama (Rep. Terri Sewell) totaled $52,379,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
101William M Spencer - Deceased IIIBirmingham, AL 35223$128,958
102Mary GoldmanLivingston, AL 35470$127,501
103Jerry QuinneyDemopolis, AL 36732$127,402
104Johnson Family Investments LLCNorthport, AL 35475$127,030
105Augusta C RobinsonTuscaloosa, AL 35405$126,851
106Allan RamseySweet Water, AL 36782$124,695
107Thomas B Smith JrEmelle, AL 35459$123,331
108Lewis Brothers Lumber Co IncAliceville, AL 35442$121,461
109Harriet C SmithSawyerville, AL 36776$121,252
110Federation Of Southern CoopEpes, AL 35460$119,886
111Elsie Taylor OdomEutaw, AL 35462$119,084
112Robins S McmurtrieHampton Cove, AL 35763$117,875
113Luce Packing Co IncMoss Point, MS 39563$116,948
114Ellis ColemanOak Vale, MS 39656$116,568
115E Roger SayersTuscaloosa, AL 35406$116,145
116Moseley Cattle CoThomaston, AL 36783$115,243
117Old Erie Farm Attn Gary SmithGreensboro, AL 36744$115,039
118Wallace Wallace NorwoodEutaw, AL 35462$114,276
119Henry FarmsBirmingham, AL 35223$113,928
120William L WelchBirmingham, AL 35216$112,256

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag