Conservation Reserve Program in 7th District of Alabama (Rep. Terri Sewell), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,252

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 7th District of Alabama (Rep. Terri Sewell) totaled $52,379,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
121Double B CorporationEmelle, AL 35459$110,994
122Louise S McevoyCatherine, AL 36728$110,824
123Pearlie C PearceGallion, AL 36742$109,638
124Aileen L NixonLivingston, AL 35470$109,383
125Kenneth H Owens JrAliceville, AL 35442$109,114
126Sue King ScottWest Greene, AL 35491$106,880
127W Myles Mayberry JrDemopolis, AL 36732$106,781
128Charles W TurnerJacksonville, FL 32217$105,359
129Harold JacobsTuscaloosa, AL 35405$105,120
130Marcia LambSalt Lake City, UT 11111$103,989
131Alan HallLivingston, AL 35470$103,302
132Clarence N DialEpes, AL 35460$101,982
133William Spencer RinglandBirmingham, AL 35213$100,831
134Mary Jane NicholsThomasville, GA 31757$100,358
135John R TeelFaunsdale, AL 36738$99,813
136Ruth Ann Shaw JohnsonGallion, AL 36742$99,084
137David P HendersonBirmingham, AL 35203$98,832
138James A Acker JrGreensboro, AL 36744$98,029
139Emily Jane DialScooba, MS 39358$97,943
140Joseph H GandyBirmingham, AL 35216$97,764

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag