Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Arkansas
(Rep. Rick Crawford)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 8,622
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford) totaled $122,894,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Griffin Farms South | Helena, AR 72342 | $2,779,247 |
2 | Deline Farms South | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,702,111 |
3 | Merchants & Planters Bank ** | Newport, AR 72112 | $869,375 |
4 | Dunns Fish Farms Inc | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $827,967 |
5 | Rdfarm Group | Marvell, AR 72366 | $779,038 |
6 | Roelee Farms | Palestine, AR 72372 | $752,485 |
7 | Deline Farms North | Charleston, MO 63834 | $619,464 |
8 | Deline Farms Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $616,849 |
9 | Oxner Ag Partnership | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $577,436 |
10 | Red River Farms | Searcy, AR 72143 | $564,688 |
11 | Coffee Creek Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $554,916 |
12 | Amos Farms | Wynne, AR 72396 | $539,088 |
13 | Whitetail Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $534,190 |
14 | Benwood Farms | Earle, AR 72331 | $528,806 |
15 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $502,638 |
16 | Sand Land Farms Inc | Leachville, AR 72438 | $491,604 |
17 | Baxter Brothers Farms | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $491,300 |
18 | C & A Heidelberger Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $474,722 |
19 | King Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $443,338 |
20 | Jeff James | Cherry Valley, AR 72324 | $392,930 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>