Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Arkansas
(Rep. Rick Crawford)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 8,622
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford) totaled $122,894,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bartlett Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $224,856 |
62 | Roger T Smith Jr | Wheatley, AR 72392 | $224,369 |
63 | Taylor Wilkison | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $220,232 |
64 | Eric Driver II | Turrell, AR 72384 | $217,196 |
65 | , | $216,204 | |
66 | Daughhetee Farms Inc | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $214,773 |
67 | Horner Farms LLC | Pollard, AR 72456 | $212,934 |
68 | Cureton Farm Partnership | Cash, AR 72421 | $211,544 |
69 | Richard Alls | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $210,560 |
70 | Clay Ridge Farms | West Helena, AR 72390 | $208,060 |
71 | 4020 Farms Partnership | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $206,773 |
72 | Spence Held Farm Partnership | Earle, AR 72331 | $204,335 |
73 | 3m Planting Company | Osceola, AR 72370 | $202,740 |
74 | Cavenaugh Planting Partnership | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $199,766 |
75 | B D Farms Ptr | Trumann, AR 72472 | $195,804 |
76 | Rohrscheib Family Farms | Lexa, AR 72355 | $195,801 |
77 | Gary Rolland | Wynne, AR 72396 | $194,708 |
78 | Hillside Farms | Elaine, AR 72333 | $189,313 |
79 | Isreal C Gordon | Lexa, AR 72355 | $189,273 |
80 | Running Lake Farms | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $188,153 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”