Market Gains in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 7,264
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford) totaled $266,631,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Pc433 Farm | Helena, AR 72342 | $465,631 |
62 | Meacham Farms | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $464,776 |
63 | Kennon & Kennon | Wynne, AR 72396 | $461,583 |
64 | Greg Engle Farms | Rector, AR 72461 | $460,152 |
65 | Boyd Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $455,061 |
66 | Walls & Walls A Partnership | Harrisburg, AR 72432 | $447,672 |
67 | E L & Samuel L Medford Ptn | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $445,156 |
68 | Foothill Farms | Wynne, AR 72396 | $443,672 |
69 | J & K Farms | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $440,841 |
70 | Williams Rice Farms Inc | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $437,372 |
71 | Mmm Joint Venture | Corning, AR 72422 | $433,233 |
72 | Mason Farming | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $431,973 |
73 | Jlc Farms | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $417,038 |
74 | Wakefield Prtnrs | Augusta, AR 72006 | $414,684 |
75 | James Farm Joint Venture | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $408,865 |
76 | Ashmore Bros & Brown Prtsp | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $404,563 |
77 | Vincent Farms | Crawfordsville, AR 72327 | $402,937 |
78 | Gng Farms Ptr | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $400,804 |
79 | Helms Farms | Clarkedale, AR 72325 | $400,337 |
80 | Gary & Lorrie Skinner Farm | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $399,591 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”