Total Conservation Programs in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 941
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford) totaled $4,355,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Joe Frank Lauderdale | Hernando, MS 38632 | $11,401 |
102 | Plh Investments Lp | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $11,276 |
103 | , | $11,257 | |
104 | Robert Brian Karnes | Cherry Valley, AR 72324 | $11,193 |
105 | Paul R Steiner Jr | Marvell, AR 72366 | $11,114 |
106 | James Neal Brien III | Tiplersville, MS 38674 | $11,066 |
107 | Alex Marconi Caretaker Trust | Proctor, AR 72376 | $10,948 |
108 | Wbc Wallace Farms Limited Partnership | Bald Knob, AR 72010 | $10,800 |
109 | Helm Hobbs Cooper III | Gregory, AR 72059 | $10,735 |
110 | Babbie Morris Lovett | Mc Crory, AR 72101 | $10,732 |
111 | James L Cothran Jr | Parkin, AR 72373 | $10,731 |
112 | Jim M Penn | Portia, AR 72457 | $10,622 |
113 | Maureen G Thomas Rev Trust | Peoria, AZ 85381 | $10,619 |
114 | Lone Tree Farms LLC | Batesville, AR 72501 | $10,312 |
115 | Clovis Dement | Rector, AR 72461 | $9,997 |
116 | Edmondson Partnership L P | Collierville, TN 38017 | $9,970 |
117 | , | $9,903 | |
118 | Danny Simpson | Rector, AR 72461 | $9,823 |
119 | Gibson Group Limited Ptr | Jonesboro, AR 72401 | $9,804 |
120 | , | $9,719 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”