Cotton Ginning Program in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,640
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford) totaled $15,625,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Henderson Ag Service Inc | Keiser, AR 72351 | $37,658 |
122 | Dane Coomer | Piggott, AR 72454 | $37,450 |
123 | G-4 Farms | Mountain Home, AR 72653 | $37,407 |
124 | Alan Gathright Farms | Monette, AR 72447 | $37,154 |
125 | Brian Mcdaniel Farms Partnership | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $37,146 |
126 | Roger & David Scott Ptr | Piggott, AR 72454 | $37,124 |
127 | Garner-nall Partnership | Lake City, AR 72437 | $36,665 |
128 | Foothill Farms II | Wynne, AR 72396 | $36,491 |
129 | Pff Farms Partnership | Lake City, AR 72437 | $36,478 |
130 | Judd Hill Foundation Trust | Heber Springs, AR 72543 | $36,298 |
131 | Bobby Cupples Farms Jv | Proctor, AR 72376 | $36,166 |
132 | Ronald C Faulkner | Caraway, AR 72419 | $36,123 |
133 | Jada Farms Inc | Rector, AR 72461 | $35,860 |
134 | Rc Farms Partnership | Lake City, AR 72437 | $35,213 |
135 | Harvey E Faulkner | Caraway, AR 72419 | $35,004 |
136 | J T Jarrett & Sons | Colt, AR 72326 | $34,852 |
137 | Kent Coomer | Greenway, AR 72430 | $34,786 |
138 | A & M Farms Inc | Dell, AR 72426 | $34,734 |
139 | Terry Palmer | Rector, AR 72461 | $34,733 |
140 | Six-forty Inc | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $34,336 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”