Market Gains in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 7,264
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford) totaled $266,631,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dabb Farms | Caraway, AR 72419 | $620,720 |
42 | Red River Farms | Searcy, AR 72143 | $596,818 |
43 | Caney Creek Farms Ptn II | Wynne, AR 72396 | $595,279 |
44 | Roger & David Scott Ptr | Piggott, AR 72454 | $587,377 |
45 | Cary Wilson Farms Partnership | Pollard, AR 72456 | $586,867 |
46 | Steimel Joint Venture | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $583,229 |
47 | Langley Partnership | Piggott, AR 72454 | $573,920 |
48 | Crossruff Farms Partnership | Hickory Ridge, AR 72347 | $571,516 |
49 | Forrest Mitchell & Sons Ptn | Wynne, AR 72396 | $571,003 |
50 | Tee Farming | Wynne, AR 72396 | $570,989 |
51 | C-4-m Joint Venture | Corning, AR 72422 | $559,146 |
52 | Parker & Parker Farms | Harrisburg, AR 72432 | $530,819 |
53 | Curtis And Dena Nash | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $520,722 |
54 | W & W Farms | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $508,810 |
55 | Williams Partnership Farms | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $502,308 |
56 | R & J Farms Partnership | Lake City, AR 72437 | $501,331 |
57 | Clements & Jennings Farms | Harrisburg, AR 72432 | $492,079 |
58 | Casey Farms Partnership | Heth, AR 72346 | $475,861 |
59 | S & M Farms | Mc Crory, AR 72101 | $473,941 |
60 | Ellis Farms Ptr New | Maynard, AR 72444 | $471,268 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”