Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 37,528

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford) totaled $6,751,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
21Trail PartnershipWidener, AR 72394$10,184,267
22Holthouse FarmsOsceola, AR 72370$9,952,412
23Bancorp South Bank **Paragould, AR 72450$9,824,274
24Storey FarmingMarvell, AR 72366$9,543,295
25James Farm Joint VentureWalnut Ridge, AR 72476$9,532,258
26Sellmeyer Farms Joint VentureKnobel, AR 72435$9,460,878
27Vincent FarmsCrawfordsville, AR 72327$9,329,370
28Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$9,159,791
29Coleman Farms PtrJonesboro, AR 72404$9,054,849
30King FarmsHelena, AR 72342$8,962,241
31Fogleman Farms No 2Marion, AR 72364$8,897,740
32Young And CoPoplar Grove, AR 72374$8,708,408
33Leslie T Brown FarmsBrinkley, AR 72021$8,681,504
34Gammill FarmsTyronza, AR 72386$8,539,783
35Swift Ditch Farms PartnershipTrumann, AR 72472$8,456,741
36Clover Bend FmsJonesboro, AR 72404$8,318,292
37Long Lake PlantationHelena, AR 72342$8,173,213
38Stephen & Brent Davis FarmCotton Plant, AR 72036$7,872,063
39Caney Creek Farms Ptn IIWynne, AR 72396$7,868,947
40Penndale Farms PartnershipWynne, AR 72396$7,723,259

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag