Total Commodity Programs in 4th District of Arkansas (Rep. Bruce Westerman), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 5,949

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 4th District of Arkansas (Rep. Bruce Westerman) totaled $256,886,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
21Hunter And CoffmanTexarkana, AR 71854$1,551,013
22Garland Frontier FarmsLinden, IN 47955$1,440,204
23Hank C DeanTexarkana, TX 75504$1,373,885
24Maranatha PartnersArkadelphia, AR 71923$1,346,224
25View Point FrForeman, AR 71836$1,312,637
26Farm Credit Services Of America **Lawton, IA 51030$1,239,685
27Pleasant Valley FarmsDoddridge, AR 71834$1,215,993
28Bruce Alford, B & L FarmsLewisville, AR 71845$1,207,140
29Valley View Farm IncFulton, AR 71838$1,206,373
30M & B Farm IncBradley, AR 71826$1,192,567
31Sed FarmsTexarkana, AR 71854$1,176,238
32Matteson Planting CompanyForeman, AR 71836$1,169,218
33Big Woods Partnership OneLittle Rock, AR 72203$1,139,668
34J B Davis FarmsLittle Rock, AR 72205$1,133,901
35Schluterman Farms IncorporatedParis, AR 72855$1,055,179
36Duck Lake Farms IncLewisville, AR 71845$1,045,528
37River Farms PartnershipTexarkana, AR 71854$1,023,004
38Brent BrosLewisville, AR 71845$1,004,170
39Riggs FarmsJonesville, LA 71343$952,918
40Andrew WhisenhuntGreenbrier, AR 72058$909,235

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag