Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 1st District of Arizona (Rep. Tom O'Halleran), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 649
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 1st District of Arizona (Rep. Tom O'Halleran) totaled $2,499,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | , | $5,055 | |
102 | Alvin Begay | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $4,864 |
103 | Annie D Coolie | Shonto, AZ 86054 | $4,828 |
104 | Janet Tsingine | Tuba City, AZ 86045 | $4,783 |
105 | Nellie B Chatter | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $4,744 |
106 | Flake Ranch LLC | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $4,733 |
107 | Raymond Tsosie | Joseph City, AZ 86032 | $4,642 |
108 | Trever M Willis | Taylor, AZ 85939 | $4,631 |
109 | Estate Of Joe B Cannon | Rimrock, AZ 86335 | $4,421 |
110 | Nonabah G Mahnke | Chinle, AZ 86503 | $4,379 |
111 | John Thompson | Eagar, AZ 85925 | $4,365 |
112 | Winkle Brothers LLC | Eagar, AZ 85925 | $4,260 |
113 | Roselita Dickson | Holbrook, AZ 86025 | $4,255 |
114 | Grace Yazzie | Ganado, AZ 86505 | $4,242 |
115 | Marie W Begay | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $4,156 |
116 | Patsy R Lee | Ganado, AZ 86505 | $3,977 |
117 | Rita B Benally | Keams Canyon, AZ 86034 | $3,956 |
118 | Zane Morris | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $3,878 |
119 | Margaret Keams | Joseph City, AZ 86032 | $3,844 |
120 | Julia A Shorty | Sanders, AZ 86512 | $3,840 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”