SELECT * FROM cd_m2020 WHERE fips='AZ01' AND progcode='livestock ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Livestock Subsidies in 1st District of Arizona (Rep. Tom O'Halleran), 2020

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 395

Recipients of Livestock Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Arizona (Rep. Tom O'Halleran) totaled $1,432,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Subsidies
2020
1Cataract Natural Reserve Lands LlFlagstaff, AZ 86002$110,009
2Babbitt Ranches LLCFlagstaff, AZ 86002$100,094
3Carrizo Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$73,522
4Turkey Creek Livestock AssociatioWhiteriver, AZ 85941$70,409
5D & I Holsteins LLC *Stanfield, AZ 85172$58,112
6Caballero Dairy Farms LLC *Eloy, AZ 85131$44,223
7North Fork Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$44,129
8Andrus Ranch Holdings LLC *Concho, AZ 85924$41,521
9David Feenstra Dba Feenstra Fries *Stanfield, AZ 85172$35,139
10White Mountain Apache Tribe *Whiteriver, AZ 85941$33,812
11Casa Grande Dairy Company LLC *Casa Grande, AZ 85130$33,231
12Du-brook Dairy Inc *Casa Grande, AZ 85194$31,910
13Richard Anglin Dairy Inc *Maricopa, AZ 85139$27,670
14Van Der Waerden Dairy LLCMaricopa, AZ 85139$24,530
15Nagiller & Sons Inc *Williams, AZ 86046$22,516
16Sierra Bonita Ranch LLC *Willcox, AZ 85643$21,440
17Bonita Cattle LLC *Willcox, AZ 85643$21,410
18Rick Bader Dba Dobson-bader CattlFlorence, AZ 85132$17,735
19Bar J Bar Cattle Company Inc *Snowflake, AZ 85937$17,623
20Double D Dairy Ltd *Stanfield, AZ 85172$14,077

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag