Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Arizona
(Rep. Tom O'Halleran)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Arizona (Rep. Tom O'Halleran), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 736
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Arizona (Rep. Tom O'Halleran) totaled $4,112,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lance Knight | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $166,329 |
2 | Carey D Dobson | Vernon, AZ 85940 | $107,865 |
3 | Donald Lann | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $99,476 |
4 | Andrus Ranch Holdings LLC | Concho, AZ 85924 | $97,231 |
5 | Platt Cattle Company LLC | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $81,543 |
6 | Black Canyon Cattle Co. LLC | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $81,455 |
7 | Turtle Cattle Co. LLC | San Simon, AZ 85632 | $75,278 |
8 | Menges Ranches LLC | Safford, AZ 85548 | $73,464 |
9 | Galyn Knight | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $66,095 |
10 | Billy B Elkins | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $64,634 |
11 | Spo Land And Cattle LLC | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $63,359 |
12 | Darcy Ely | Willcox, AZ 85644 | $63,033 |
13 | J Albert Brown Ranches | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $60,825 |
14 | , | $60,667 | |
15 | , | $45,903 | |
16 | J J Johnson LLC | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $45,881 |
17 | County Line Farms LLC | Lamar, CO 81052 | $44,579 |
18 | Justin P Bingham | Pima, AZ 85543 | $42,167 |
19 | Jake Reed Shumway | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $40,130 |
20 | Lance Flake Dba Snowflake Cattle Company | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $39,504 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>