Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Arizona (Rep. Tom O'Halleran), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 958
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Arizona (Rep. Tom O'Halleran) totaled $1,613,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Janette Tyler | Duncan, AZ 85534 | $16,656 |
22 | Andrus Ranch Holdings LLC | Concho, AZ 85924 | $16,060 |
23 | Jal Cattle LLC | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $15,840 |
24 | Robert S Flake | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $15,163 |
25 | Wengert Brothers Ranches LLC | Gilbert, AZ 85295 | $14,318 |
26 | Jerry Winn | Sanders, AZ 86512 | $13,973 |
27 | Jeffers Cattle Co | Holbrook, AZ 86025 | $11,075 |
28 | Justin P Bingham | Pima, AZ 85543 | $10,703 |
29 | Nicoll Cattle Company LLC | Eagar, AZ 85925 | $10,091 |
30 | Stud Camp LLC | Heber, AZ 85928 | $9,355 |
31 | Darcy Ely | Willcox, AZ 85644 | $9,324 |
32 | Larry Dean Leist | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $9,166 |
33 | Willis Ranch LLC | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $9,022 |
34 | Grasshopper Livestock Association | Cibecue, AZ 85911 | $8,746 |
35 | Barney Land & Cattle Company LLC | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $8,527 |
36 | Ethan Ellsworth | Show Low, AZ 85901 | $8,090 |
37 | Michael Frey | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $7,775 |
38 | Dale Earven | Duncan, AZ 85534 | $7,713 |
39 | Carol A Shaff- The Ca Shaff Revocable Trust | Joseph City, AZ 86032 | $7,652 |
40 | Forestdale Livestock Association | Whiteriver, AZ 85941 | $7,504 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”