Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 4th District of Arizona (Rep. Paul Gosar), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 39 of 39
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 4th District of Arizona (Rep. Paul Gosar) totaled $3,569,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Rayburn Evans | Parker, AZ 85344 | $26,482 |
| 22 | Manuel Cavazos | Ehrenberg, AZ 85334 | $18,067 |
| 23 | Abel Penaloza | Parker, AZ 85344 | $14,180 |
| 24 | Miguel Torres, Jr Dba Desert Green Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $14,110 |
| 25 | Daniel Leivas Jr | Parker, AZ 85344 | $12,201 |
| 26 | Julio Cesar Castro Cruz | Parker, AZ 85344 | $10,305 |
| 27 | David Page | Parker, AZ 85344 | $9,271 |
| 28 | Staci Page | Parker, AZ 85344 | $9,271 |
| 29 | Manuel Villarreal | Lake Havasu City, AZ 86403 | $7,969 |
| 30 | John Nelson Jr | Parker, AZ 85344 | $6,451 |
| 31 | Roger Farms LLC Dba Desert Distri | Blythe, CA 92225 | $6,279 |
| 32 | Richard A Silva Sr | Parker, AZ 85344 | $5,171 |
| 33 | Ray Allen Martinez | Parker, AZ 85344 | $4,515 |
| 34 | Jorge Aranjo | Parker, AZ 85344 | $4,457 |
| 35 | Daniel Leivas | Parker, AZ 85344 | $3,040 |
| 36 | Basilio And Rachel Lamas Dba B&r Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $2,166 |
| 37 | Kenny Pierce | Parker, AZ 85344 | $2,163 |
| 38 | C Jene Hemphill | Cibola, AZ 85328 | $1,261 |
| 39 | Winstill Humeumptewa Sr | Parker, AZ 85344 | $598 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
<< Previous
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf