Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 69
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $477,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Five Dot Land & Cattle Co | Standish, CA 96128 | $3,459 |
42 | Donald W Prather | Alturas, CA 96101 | $3,417 |
43 | Raymond E White | Corning, CA 96021 | $3,363 |
44 | Willow Creek Ranch | Susanville, CA 96130 | $3,334 |
45 | Darrell Wood | Vina, CA 96092 | $3,333 |
46 | Wood Cattle Ranch Inc | Susanville, CA 96127 | $3,333 |
47 | Mary L Wigno | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $3,175 |
48 | David W Allen | French Camp, CA 95231 | $3,139 |
49 | Clyde A Hill | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $3,106 |
50 | Don Blair | Davis Creek, CA 96108 | $3,049 |
51 | Martinovich Living Trust Dated Ju | Corning, CA 96021 | $2,938 |
52 | Curtis B Talbott | Alturas, CA 96101 | $2,909 |
53 | Wade Will | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $2,711 |
54 | Louis Shaffer | Alturas, CA 96101 | $2,711 |
55 | Earnest Herefords | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $2,500 |
56 | Douglas C White | Corning, CA 96021 | $2,405 |
57 | Karen Foster | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $2,298 |
58 | Marcelino Robles | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $2,295 |
59 | Jack Rosebush | Taylorsville, CA 95983 | $2,100 |
60 | Pete Dagorret | Corning, CA 96021 | $1,900 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”