Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 342
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $9,216,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Hagata Ranch Inc | Susanville, CA 96130 | $48,908 |
62 | Duane Crum | Little Valley, CA 96056 | $48,449 |
63 | Hapgood Ranch | Lake City, CA 96115 | $48,059 |
64 | Thomas Nielsen | Gazelle, CA 96034 | $46,938 |
65 | Bryan Griffin | Sierraville, CA 96126 | $46,665 |
66 | Richard L. Musachia | Wendel, CA 96136 | $46,348 |
67 | Gardner & Gardner Ranch | Davis Creek, CA 96108 | $46,090 |
68 | Erik O Roen Family Trust U/a/d August 27, 2004 | Knights Ferry, CA 95361 | $45,856 |
69 | Shirley Murrer | Susanville, CA 96130 | $45,769 |
70 | Blue Tent Farms LLC | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $44,594 |
71 | Matandy Land & Cattle Co | Standish, CA 96128 | $44,289 |
72 | Florence Bordwell | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $43,647 |
73 | Andrew Ospital | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $43,543 |
74 | Scarface Investments LLC | Yerington, NV 89447 | $43,541 |
75 | Hagge Ranch Inc | Alturas, CA 96101 | $43,514 |
76 | Robert H Mackey & Sons Inc | Alturas, CA 96101 | $42,602 |
77 | Susan Knox | Vina, CA 96092 | $42,438 |
78 | Zachery Hannah | Likely, CA 96116 | $42,425 |
79 | Roberti Ranch | Loyalton, CA 96118 | $42,340 |
80 | Jensen Ranch | Orland, CA 95963 | $41,917 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”