Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 144

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $3,877,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
61Handlery Hotels IncSan Francisco, CA 94108$14,553
62Earnest HerefordsMcarthur, CA 96056$14,228
63Douglas C WhiteCorning, CA 96021$14,084
64Dean CookTruckee, CA 96160$13,728
65Dennis HoffmanThedford, NE 69166$13,493
66Lassen 7d Ranch IncSusanville, CA 96130$13,298
67Shirley Jeanne Carmichael FamilyGrand Junction, CO 81505$13,144
68Estill Ranches LLCGerlach, NV 89412$12,898
69Gregory ValceschiniSusanville, CA 96130$10,766
70Herbert A MillerLitchfield, CA 96117$10,494
71George Goodwin Family LpBeckwourth, CA 96129$9,747
72Clarence KatenTillamook, OR 97141$9,676
73Lynchpin Partners LLCCleveland, OH 44122$9,393
74Thomas A RobisonKlamath Falls, OR 97603$9,319
75Lane Labbe'Quincy, CA 95971$9,266
76Cabodi Family TrustStandish, CA 96128$9,072
77Phillip NoiaGreenville, CA 95947$8,822
78Luis AcevesTulelake, CA 96134$8,805
79Big Bluff RanchRed Bluff, CA 96080$8,645
80Gary RomanoBeckwourth, CA 96129$8,607

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag