Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 342
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $9,216,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Joe Egan | Janesville, CA 96114 | $41,902 |
82 | Nick Retterath | Janesville, CA 96114 | $40,463 |
83 | Linda Hutchison | New Pine Creek, OR 97635 | $40,214 |
84 | Rollin Throne | Malin, OR 97632 | $39,467 |
85 | Jesse Garland Freeman | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $38,861 |
86 | Adair Brown | Davis Creek, CA 96108 | $38,281 |
87 | Jack Sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $37,856 |
88 | Walter E Mohr | Canby, CA 96015 | $37,145 |
89 | Raymond Anklin | Alturas, CA 96101 | $35,494 |
90 | Roger Nicholson | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $34,118 |
91 | John C Barnum | Herlong, CA 96113 | $34,113 |
92 | Travis Stewart | Janesville, CA 96114 | $33,807 |
93 | Jeremiah G Costello | Gardena, CA 90247 | $33,689 |
94 | Robert D Fumasi Family Trust-robert Fumasi | Orland, CA 95963 | $33,113 |
95 | Novy Ranches | Grenada, CA 96038 | $32,793 |
96 | Frank Endres | Corning, CA 96021 | $32,698 |
97 | Kelley Ferry | Alturas, CA 96101 | $32,260 |
98 | , | $32,241 | |
99 | , | $32,147 | |
100 | Jack Hanson | Susanville, CA 96130 | $31,690 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”