Total Disaster Programs in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 529
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $28,560,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | John Matley & Son | Doyle, CA 96109 | $63,523 |
122 | Charles Perkins | Santa Barbara, CA 93108 | $62,872 |
123 | Robert H Mackey & Sons Inc | Alturas, CA 96101 | $62,623 |
124 | Rollin Throne | Malin, OR 97632 | $62,612 |
125 | Nicholas Kyle Baley | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $62,610 |
126 | Bryan Griffin | Sierraville, CA 96126 | $62,243 |
127 | Adair Brown | Davis Creek, CA 96108 | $61,622 |
128 | Broken Ridge LLC | San Ramon, CA 94582 | $61,265 |
129 | John C Barnum | Herlong, CA 96113 | $60,743 |
130 | Jeremiah G Costello | Gardena, CA 90247 | $60,483 |
131 | Non Grantors Trust Of The Shaffer Family Irrevocab | Alturas, CA 96101 | $60,416 |
132 | Peter N Gerig - The Gerig Family Trust | Bieber, CA 96009 | $59,900 |
133 | , | $58,919 | |
134 | Wyatt R. Brown | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $58,499 |
135 | Jack Hanson | Susanville, CA 96130 | $58,001 |
136 | , | $56,490 | |
137 | Robert P Weir | Standish, CA 96128 | $56,403 |
138 | Jesse Garland Freeman | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $56,249 |
139 | Raymond Dutro Farms Inc | Gerber, CA 96035 | $56,120 |
140 | Scarface Investments LLC | Yerington, NV 89447 | $56,020 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”