Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 289
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $3,935,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Daha Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $7,342 |
122 | Alvin G Blickenstaff | Janesville, CA 96114 | $7,229 |
123 | Cmp2 LLC | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $7,081 |
124 | Parker Orchards | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $7,056 |
125 | Maywood Farms | Corning, CA 96021 | $7,009 |
126 | Demetrio Munoz | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $6,669 |
127 | Erin M Dypvik | Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 | $6,605 |
128 | Patricia Rogers | Lookout, CA 96054 | $6,408 |
129 | Krenek Farms Inc | Orland, CA 95963 | $6,333 |
130 | Robert F Pyle | Susanville, CA 96130 | $6,164 |
131 | Alderson Family 2007 Trust | Gerber, CA 96035 | $6,078 |
132 | Nick Macy | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $6,011 |
133 | Daniel Stewart | Corning, CA 96021 | $5,955 |
134 | John Prosser | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $5,894 |
135 | James T Cockrell | Lake City, CA 96115 | $5,850 |
136 | Matandy Land & Cattle Co | Standish, CA 96128 | $5,798 |
137 | Seeley Mudd | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $5,628 |
138 | Brad Criner | Canby, CA 96015 | $5,537 |
139 | Wesley Williams | Corning, CA 96021 | $5,504 |
140 | Bernard Fishman Dba Corning Orchards | Long Beach, CA 90815 | $5,476 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”