Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 144

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $3,877,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
121Audrey EganSusanville, CA 96130$3,465
122Carl H MeyersGreenville, CA 95947$3,430
123Seus Family Farms LLCTulelake, CA 96134$3,397
124William R StonecypherTulelake, CA 96134$3,375
125Joe D HemphillTulelake, CA 96134$3,375
126Evelyn CloughRed Bluff, CA 96080$3,211
127Hussa RanchCedarville, CA 96104$3,151
128Larzabal RanchRed Bluff, CA 96080$3,056
129James J KnappPleasant Hill, CA 94523$3,000
130Linda MenefeeCorning, CA 96021$2,948
131The 1984 Alfred Gassiot TrustVinton, CA 96135$2,918
132James D WaldenTulelake, CA 96134$2,729
133Carolyn Matz Trust Dated May 17 2Corning, CA 96021$2,687
134David BolesCorning, CA 96021$2,320
135Charles A Orwick III Trust Of 200Red Bluff, CA 96080$2,271
136David R BradshawLookout, CA 96054$2,100
137Bob L FritzingerLancaster, CA 93536$1,865
138Louis ShafferAlturas, CA 96101$1,611
139R H ChamberlainFlournoy, CA 96029$1,181
140Hagata Ranch IncSusanville, CA 96130$925

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag