Total Disaster Programs in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 356
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $10,736,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Robert Thomas Pyle | Milford, CA 96121 | $17,252 |
142 | William Stevenson | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $16,969 |
143 | James T Fee | Fort Bidwell, CA 96112 | $16,948 |
144 | Mary Palmer-nowland | Medford, OR 97501 | $16,201 |
145 | Herb Jasper | New Pine Creek, OR 97635 | $15,840 |
146 | Hat Creek Grown LLC | Hat Creek, CA 96040 | $15,745 |
147 | Jesse Garland Freeman | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $15,744 |
148 | Parady Ranch | Standish, CA 96128 | $15,742 |
149 | Janet Lee Barnes | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $15,695 |
150 | Nicki R Alves | New Pine Creek, OR 97635 | $15,682 |
151 | Bert Owens - 2015 Owens Family Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $15,602 |
152 | Joseph J. Bertotti | Janesville, CA 96114 | $15,589 |
153 | Steven Brown | Alturas, CA 96101 | $15,439 |
154 | Bryan Williams | Vinton, CA 96135 | $15,244 |
155 | Amber E Wolverton | Vina, CA 96092 | $15,173 |
156 | Lee C Loverin | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $13,966 |
157 | Gary Monchamp Inc | Lookout, CA 96054 | $13,854 |
158 | Annie Rose Tipton | Sierraville, CA 96126 | $13,391 |
159 | Rick Malcolm | Alturas, CA 96101 | $13,354 |
160 | Schroeder, Inc. | Janesville, CA 96114 | $13,296 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”