Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 289
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $3,935,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Craig D Bailey Dba Cotton Bow Ranch | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $2,868 |
182 | Thad Johnson | Malin, OR 97632 | $2,867 |
183 | Tom Martinez | Lake City, CA 96115 | $2,798 |
184 | Matthew Peacher | Vina, CA 96092 | $2,716 |
185 | Jacob E Baley | Merrill, OR 97633 | $2,648 |
186 | Hagge Ranch Inc | Alturas, CA 96101 | $2,609 |
187 | The Copp Family Trust | Adin, CA 96006 | $2,594 |
188 | Blaire L Mootz | Chico, CA 95973 | $2,584 |
189 | Juan Nerey | Corning, CA 96021 | $2,574 |
190 | Wendell L Raimer | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $2,571 |
191 | Sharon K Boneck | Lake City, CA 96115 | $2,558 |
192 | Pablo Nerey | Corning, CA 96021 | $2,535 |
193 | C David Demulder | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $2,528 |
194 | Jeff Askew | Ravendale, CA 96123 | $2,490 |
195 | Karl Baker | Doyle, CA 96109 | $2,474 |
196 | Wyatt Finley Ag | Fort Jones, CA 96032 | $2,474 |
197 | Lynette Myers | Adin, CA 96006 | $2,461 |
198 | Likely Land & Livestock | Likely, CA 96116 | $2,440 |
199 | Hemphill Ranch Inc | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $2,378 |
200 | Gardner & Gardner Ranch | Davis Creek, CA 96108 | $2,369 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”