Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 152
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $1,362,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mcarthur Livestock | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $8,651 |
42 | Michael J Lee | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $8,141 |
43 | Staunton Bros Partnership | Malin, OR 97632 | $7,599 |
44 | Patrick J Fields | Alturas, CA 96101 | $7,507 |
45 | Castle Rock Farms LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $6,808 |
46 | Dunlea Farm & Ranch LLC | Malin, OR 97632 | $6,793 |
47 | Scott Farms Inc | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $6,783 |
48 | Gary Monchamp Inc | Lookout, CA 96054 | $6,314 |
49 | J A Conner 2001 Living Trust | Adin, CA 96006 | $6,264 |
50 | Jessica J. Hemphill | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $6,085 |
51 | Harvey Ranch | Weiser, ID 83672 | $6,042 |
52 | Delyle D Diaz | Merrill, OR 97633 | $5,928 |
53 | John Prosser | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $5,927 |
54 | Staunton Farms, Lp | Malin, OR 97632 | $5,653 |
55 | Frank G Prosser | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $4,649 |
56 | Tsh Enterprises | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $4,629 |
57 | Stewart Fmly Trust Dba Stewart Bros Land & Cattle | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $4,606 |
58 | Jerry Lequieu | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $4,422 |
59 | Kevin D Wright | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $4,422 |
60 | Laurence G Bagg | Malin, OR 97632 | $4,311 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”