Total Disaster Programs in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 258
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) totaled $5,508,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ernest W Etter | Petrolia, CA 95558 | $45,620 |
42 | William Nunes | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $45,365 |
43 | Albin Livestock LLC | Fortuna, CA 95540 | $44,036 |
44 | Jack P Russ | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $43,060 |
45 | Prior Ranch Company LLC | Hydesville, CA 95547 | $42,101 |
46 | Louis Cook | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $40,341 |
47 | Spaletta Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $39,937 |
48 | Debra Copher | Orick, CA 95555 | $39,871 |
49 | Cypress Lane Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $39,491 |
50 | Kehoe Dairy Inc | Inverness, CA 94937 | $39,444 |
51 | Moreda Valley Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $39,271 |
52 | Christie Moore | Kneeland, CA 95549 | $38,598 |
53 | Kyle E Roscoe | Petrolia, CA 95558 | $35,183 |
54 | Mcdonald Lucchesi Cattle | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $34,189 |
55 | Clarence R Bugenig | Loleta, CA 95551 | $33,736 |
56 | Fort Baker Ranch Co | Kneeland, CA 95549 | $32,335 |
57 | Eaton Roughs Ranch Cattle LLC | Fortuna, CA 95540 | $32,159 |
58 | Kenneth A Wilson-kenneth A Wilson And Clairette W | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $31,105 |
59 | , | $30,735 | |
60 | Palmer Westbrook Inc | Smith River, CA 95567 | $30,342 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”