SELECT * FROM cd_mtotal WHERE fips='CA03' AND progcode='totalfarm ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Subtotal, Farming Subsidies in 3rd District of California (Rep. John Garamendi), 1995-2020‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 8,141

Recipients of Subtotal, Farming Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of California (Rep. John Garamendi) totaled $1,908,000,000 in from 1995-2020‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Subtotal, Farming Subsidies
1Canal Farms *Maxwell, CA 95955$9,143,147
2Colusa Indian Community Council *Colusa, CA 95932$8,569,074
3S B & L La Grande *Williams, CA 95987$7,971,052
4Arnold Hoffart Mark Hoffart & Nei *Robbins, CA 95676$7,501,235
5Sjv Enterprises *Nicolaus, CA 95659$6,909,329
6Chrisman Farms *Williams, CA 95987$6,801,520
7Eastman Ranch *Woodland, CA 95776$6,325,864
8Valley Farms *Live Oak, CA 95953$6,256,061
9K-four Farms *Yuba City, CA 95993$5,980,955
10Van Dyke Brothers *Pleasant Grove, CA 95668$5,688,650
11Spooner & Sons *Willows, CA 95988$5,292,375
12River Garden Farms Company *Knights Landing, CA 95645$5,169,460
13Jasuma Farms *Maxwell, CA 95955$5,050,964
14T & P Farms *Arbuckle, CA 95912$4,992,956
15Sutton Brothers *Maxwell, CA 95955$4,837,462
16Henning Rice Farms *Orland, CA 95963$4,765,578
17H & A Andreotti *Colusa, CA 95932$4,701,650
18J T & K Kalfsbeek *Arbuckle, CA 95912$4,606,974
19Murphy Lake Farms *Woodland, CA 95776$4,527,800
20M & F Farms *Woodland, CA 95695$4,507,114

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.


Farm Subsidies Education