Total Disaster Programs in 8th District of California (Rep. Paul Cook), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 71

Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 8th District of California (Rep. Paul Cook) totaled $12,155,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Disaster Programs
1995-2023
1I & M Sheep CoBakersfield, CA 93388$2,029,849
2Echenique LivestockBakersfield, CA 93388$1,140,393
3Ansolabehere Sheep CoBakersfield, CA 93307$1,084,318
4Hunewill Land & Livestock Co IncWellington, NV 89444$918,690
5F I M CorpSmith, NV 89430$851,966
6Borda Land & Sheep Co LLCGardnerville, NV 89410$742,000
7R N Fulstone CoSmith, NV 89430$740,213
8Chichester Ranches IncColeville, CA 96107$732,103
9The Giacomini TrustBishop, CA 93514$603,284
10Four J Cattle CorpBishop, CA 93514$516,241
11Lacey LivestockPaso Robles, CA 93447$372,714
12David W DoonanBishop, CA 93514$366,746
13Borda Family Limited PartnershipGardnerville, NV 89410$363,863
14Park Livestock Co IncTopaz, CA 96133$319,349
15The James W And Dorothy Cashbaugh TrustBishop, CA 93514$177,569
16Zack Ranch LLCBishop, CA 93514$166,758
17Mary Fulstone HussmanTopaz, CA 96133$121,318
18Lone Tree Cattle CoBellflower, CA 90707$113,001
19James And Dorothy Cashbaugh Living TrustBishop, CA 93514$108,550
20Swauger Ranch IncTopaz, CA 96133$104,519

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag