Conservation Reserve Program in 3rd District of Colorado (Rep. Scott Tipton), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 334
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 3rd District of Colorado (Rep. Scott Tipton) totaled $3,467,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Frontier Bank ** | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $126,619 |
2 | Mike & Jim Kruse Partnership | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $92,934 |
3 | Wilton Earle & Sons | Craig, CO 81625 | $63,544 |
4 | Farm Credit Of Southern Colorado ** | Lamar, CO 81052 | $62,650 |
5 | Rad Counts, LLC | Craig, CO 81625 | $60,240 |
6 | Guynes Farm Partnership | Dove Creek, CO 81324 | $54,730 |
7 | Smith Rancho Land & Livestock LLC | Craig, CO 81626 | $50,729 |
8 | Louie E Entz | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $50,000 |
9 | Gail J Bowman Revocable Trust | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $49,843 |
10 | Ronald R Bowman Revocable Trust | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $49,843 |
11 | John D Kretsinger | Corpus Christi, TX 78412 | $48,356 |
12 | Steve Chappell | Cortez, CO 81321 | $48,292 |
13 | Mirko Kruse | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $47,252 |
14 | Laurelin Kruse | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $47,252 |
15 | Trevan Pepper | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $47,250 |
16 | Yampa Valley Bank ** | Craig, CO 81625 | $46,582 |
17 | Brian C Rue | South Fork, CO 81154 | $45,834 |
18 | Andrea Rue | South Fork, CO 81154 | $45,834 |
19 | First Southwest Bank ** | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $44,100 |
20 | Holly Grace Murphy | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $44,066 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>