Total Commodity Programs in 3rd District of Colorado (Rep. Scott Tipton), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 7,777

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 3rd District of Colorado (Rep. Scott Tipton) totaled $265,378,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$1,681,960
2Martinez Farms LLCAlamosa, CO 81101$1,645,649
3Upper Valley Holsteins IncAustin, CO 81410$1,567,030
4Mitchell Ag Production FlpMonte Vista, CO 81144$1,522,438
5Price Farms LLCCenter, CO 81125$1,480,838
6Nottingham Land & Livestock LllpCraig, CO 81626$1,444,112
7Bret GrandboucheCraig, CO 81625$1,412,312
8Zapata Seed CompanyHooper, CO 81136$1,406,681
9Mike Mitchell Farms LLCMonte Vista, CO 81144$1,402,992
10Ute Mountain Ute Farm & Ranch EntTowaoc, CO 81334$1,397,164
11Van Treese Farms IncMonte Vista, CO 81144$1,384,390
12Richard RamstetterCenter, CO 81125$1,346,606
13Worley Family Farms, LLCMonte Vista, CO 81144$1,248,200
14Pro-seed IncCenter, CO 81125$1,244,665
15Crestone View Farms LLCCenter, CO 81125$1,227,897
16Three S RanchBlanca, CO 81123$1,202,043
17Kelby Pepper /dba Kelby Pepper FarmsCenter, CO 81125$1,166,185
18David Faucette Farms LLCSanford, CO 81151$1,134,220
19M & M Grain And Produce LLCCenter, CO 81125$1,129,919
20Ponderosa Partnership LLCCenter, CO 81125$1,118,732

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag