Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Colorado (Rep. Ken Buck), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 14,037
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Colorado (Rep. Ken Buck) totaled $1,392,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Diana J Shelton | Lamar, CO 81052 | $1,338,660 |
22 | J & L Farms Ptr | Eads, CO 81036 | $1,329,569 |
23 | Land Partnership | Leawood, KS 66206 | $1,315,467 |
24 | D & C Schulte Crp Partnership | Greeley, CO 80631 | $1,307,883 |
25 | Georgetta L Tempel | Wiley, CO 81092 | $1,303,687 |
26 | Steve F Shelton | Lamar, CO 81052 | $1,294,634 |
27 | Perry J Tempel | San Diego, CA 92109 | $1,283,951 |
28 | Alice Borkosky | Wild Horse, CO 80862 | $1,275,813 |
29 | Kansas Farming Company | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $1,271,972 |
30 | Robbins Ranches Inc | Walsh, CO 81090 | $1,261,664 |
31 | Duvall Ranches Inc | Granada, CO 81041 | $1,261,649 |
32 | Wdmg Real Estate | Midland, TX 79702 | $1,260,905 |
33 | Greg Spitzer | Wiley, CO 81092 | $1,244,725 |
34 | Kelly Spitzer | Wiley, CO 81092 | $1,242,795 |
35 | Cure Brothers | Bethune, CO 80805 | $1,240,034 |
36 | Theresia Elizabeth Kerfoot | Eads, CO 81036 | $1,236,894 |
37 | Medlin Family Partnership | Sullivan, MO 63080 | $1,222,957 |
38 | Gerry Ohr | Lindon, CO 80740 | $1,220,607 |
39 | James Fletcher | Holly, CO 81047 | $1,219,581 |
40 | Elda E Stavely | Haswell, CO 81045 | $1,216,018 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”