Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Colorado (Rep. Ken Buck), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,766
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Colorado (Rep. Ken Buck) totaled $42,922,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ginger L Marx | Seibert, CO 80834 | $50,000 |
62 | Justin W Imhof | Yuma, CO 80759 | $50,000 |
63 | Trahern Ranch LLC | Walsh, CO 81090 | $50,000 |
64 | Mr Justin Mundell | Walsh, CO 81090 | $50,000 |
65 | Shallow River Ranch Inc | Burlington, CO 80807 | $50,000 |
66 | Desirae Mundell | Walsh, CO 81090 | $50,000 |
67 | Jaws Land Company | Akron, CO 80720 | $50,000 |
68 | Lj Land LLC | Burlington, CO 80807 | $50,000 |
69 | Ty Sisson | Springfield, CO 81073 | $50,000 |
70 | 3m Farms Inc | Yuma, CO 80759 | $50,000 |
71 | Pamela Ann Sisson | La Junta, CO 81050 | $50,000 |
72 | Schroder Red Angus | Campo, CO 81029 | $50,000 |
73 | Ruth M Buller Dba Ruth M Harms Revocable Trust | Oklahoma City, OK 73165 | $50,000 |
74 | William Meier | Brighton, CO 80601 | $50,000 |
75 | Rtp Land Co LLC | Fort Lupton, CO 80621 | $50,000 |
76 | Nicht Verstehe LLC | Wray, CO 80758 | $50,000 |
77 | Mark Weirich | Eads, CO 81036 | $50,000 |
78 | Southern Plains Land Trust, Inc. | Lamar, CO 81052 | $50,000 |
79 | , | $50,000 | |
80 | , | $50,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”