Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 4th District of Colorado (Rep. Ken Buck), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 6,150
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 4th District of Colorado (Rep. Ken Buck) totaled $177,706,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Eastern Colorado Seeds, LLC | Burlington, CO 80807 | $250,000 |
82 | Mcendaffer Cattle Co | Sterling, CO 80751 | $250,000 |
83 | Robert G Weber | Sheridan Lake, CO 81071 | $249,222 |
84 | Barry Hinkhouse | Burlington, CO 80807 | $248,522 |
85 | Ss Shiloh Ptr | Towner, CO 81071 | $245,762 |
86 | Blm LLC | Julesburg, CO 80737 | $244,519 |
87 | Smelker Farms | Kit Carson, CO 80825 | $243,539 |
88 | Diane Sanders | Towner, CO 81071 | $238,969 |
89 | Catherine Scherler | Brandon, CO 81071 | $237,422 |
90 | Border Farms | Idalia, CO 80735 | $237,253 |
91 | Krogmeier Farms | Holyoke, CO 80734 | $236,551 |
92 | Tomes Ag | Burlington, CO 80807 | $235,484 |
93 | Breidenbach Bros Inc | Iliff, CO 80736 | $234,497 |
94 | Spitzer Family Farms | Wiley, CO 81092 | $232,739 |
95 | Stieb Bros Inc | Iliff, CO 80736 | $229,628 |
96 | Triple E Farms LLC | Wild Horse, CO 80862 | $228,353 |
97 | Oestman Farms LLC | Eckley, CO 80727 | $227,447 |
98 | Mark Roth Farms | Yuma, CO 80759 | $224,735 |
99 | Rbs Farms | Burlington, CO 80807 | $224,441 |
100 | Lazy Day Farm Gp | Yuma, CO 80759 | $223,757 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”