Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Colorado (Rep. Ken Buck), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 14,037

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Colorado (Rep. Ken Buck) totaled $1,392,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
1Horse Creek FarmsSpringfield, CO 81073$4,431,497
2Farm Credit Of Southern Colorado **Lamar, CO 81052$2,981,340
3Reystead Family PartnershipHaswell, CO 81045$2,767,441
4Alpine FiveBurlington, CO 80807$2,503,880
5Iron Springs FarmsSpringfield, CO 81073$2,146,175
6Schutte Farms PartnershipBurlington, CO 80807$2,138,452
7B & C Farms PartnershipCheyenne Wells, CO 80810$1,965,705
8Premier Farm Credit Fica **Yuma, CO 80759$1,840,111
9Konig FarmsBriggsdale, CO 80611$1,662,161
10William D GreathouseSpringfield, CO 81073$1,630,462
11Edward E & Sheri Jones JvLamar, CO 81052$1,599,698
12Kent Farms PartnershipTipton, KS 67485$1,569,784
13Hatcher Land & Cattle CoLiberal, KS 67901$1,509,894
14Thiessen FarmsSterling, CO 80751$1,433,191
15Chris E RundellLamar, CO 81052$1,425,134
16Jmb Family FarmsBethune, CO 80805$1,414,056
17Anchor B Farms IncHooker, OK 73945$1,403,034
18T & L IncVienna, VA 22180$1,396,140
19Milton Craig KerfootEads, CO 81036$1,386,328
20Kenneth CronkWoodrow, CO 80757$1,346,856

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag