Market Loss Assistance Program in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 234
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney) totaled $3,173,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gluck's Dairy Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $95,923 |
2 | Bass Farm | Windham, CT 06280 | $80,784 |
3 | Fairvue Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $79,567 |
4 | Cushman Farms Lp | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $74,214 |
5 | Molodich Farms Inc | Moosup, CT 06354 | $72,588 |
6 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $69,580 |
7 | Desjardins Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $62,617 |
8 | Palmer Farm | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $58,604 |
9 | Spielman Farm | Baltic, CT 06330 | $57,919 |
10 | Tyler Farm LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $57,860 |
11 | Spruce Hill Farms | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $56,663 |
12 | Valleyside Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $54,529 |
13 | Creamery Brook Bison LLC | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $51,560 |
14 | Steven V Snurkowski | Preston, CT 06365 | $48,090 |
15 | Fort Hill Farms LLC | Thompson, CT 06277 | $45,179 |
16 | Fairholm Farm Inc | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $45,075 |
17 | Blue Slope Farm Inc | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $44,633 |
18 | Harvey Polinsky | Jewett City, CT 06351 | $44,444 |
19 | David B Lewis | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $40,052 |
20 | John J Osga Jr | Griswold, CT 06351 | $39,988 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>