Counter Cyclical Program in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 147
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney) totaled $833,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Pinecroft Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $10,811 |
22 | Joseph W Majcher | Preston, CT 06365 | $9,490 |
23 | Harvey Polinsky | Jewett City, CT 06351 | $9,370 |
24 | John J Osga Jr | Griswold, CT 06351 | $9,114 |
25 | Fairholm Farm Inc | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $8,987 |
26 | Marc J Wolf Rew Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $8,885 |
27 | Murdock Farm | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $8,883 |
28 | May Hill Farm LLC | East Woodstock, CT 06244 | $8,557 |
29 | Blue Slope Farm Inc | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $8,328 |
30 | Hillyland Farm | Windham, CT 06280 | $8,177 |
31 | Russell Gray | Moosup, CT 06354 | $8,008 |
32 | Sunnyside Farm L L C | Voluntown, CT 06384 | $7,428 |
33 | Richard Coombs | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $7,143 |
34 | John Ennis | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $7,032 |
35 | Clark W Woodmansee III | Preston, CT 06365 | $6,898 |
36 | Tiffany Farms | Old Lyme, CT 06371 | $6,743 |
37 | Maegog Farms LLC | Salem, CT 06420 | $6,738 |
38 | Francis Amaral | Oneco, CT 06373 | $6,641 |
39 | Willard J Stearns & Sons Inc | Storrs Mansfield, CT 06268 | $6,231 |
40 | Roland E Burroughs Jr | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $6,211 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”