Market Loss Assistance Program in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 234
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney) totaled $3,173,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Kenneth Kuper | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $7,580 |
102 | Wychwood Farms | Stonington, CT 06378 | $7,557 |
103 | R E W Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $7,233 |
104 | Richard H Morgan | Ledyard, CT 06339 | $7,223 |
105 | Shawn Mcgillicuddy Dba Square A Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $6,931 |
106 | Klara Bender | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $6,777 |
107 | Cynthia D Arons | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $6,760 |
108 | Our Acres Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $6,740 |
109 | Fred S Mcneely | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $6,556 |
110 | Frank Niewiarowski | Preston, CT 06365 | $6,533 |
111 | Cushman Nathan P. And Nathan R. | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $6,530 |
112 | Kevin Dubicki | Norwich, CT 06360 | $6,258 |
113 | Abbott Spring Farm Lp | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $5,875 |
114 | Willis Maynard | Voluntown, CT 06384 | $5,810 |
115 | Sabin Spalding | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $5,766 |
116 | Laframboise Farm | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $5,732 |
117 | George H Robinson | Stonington, CT 06378 | $5,726 |
118 | Richard Campbell | Griswold, CT 06351 | $5,648 |
119 | Louise T Randall | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $5,537 |
120 | James E Mccaw | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $5,233 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”