Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Connecticut
(Rep. Joe Courtney)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 664
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney) totaled $43,241,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas R Davis Murdock Farm | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $256,524 |
42 | Coatney Hill Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $252,672 |
43 | Buell's Orchard | Eastford, CT 06242 | $246,580 |
44 | Twin Hill Farm LLC | Scotland, CT 06264 | $237,168 |
45 | Gerald W Grabarek | Preston, CT 06365 | $231,526 |
46 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $211,065 |
47 | Hillyland Farm | Windham, CT 06280 | $202,466 |
48 | Tiffany Farms | Old Lyme, CT 06371 | $198,632 |
49 | Nancy Macglaflin | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $196,694 |
50 | Richard Coombs | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $194,450 |
51 | Creamery Brook Bison LLC | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $189,425 |
52 | Canterbury Horticulture LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $188,546 |
53 | May Hill Farm LLC | East Woodstock, CT 06244 | $186,638 |
54 | Ernest Norman | Jewett City, CT 06351 | $185,560 |
55 | Jeffrey S Cone | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $180,512 |
56 | Hibbard Hill Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $178,461 |
57 | Valley View Dairy LLC | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $176,956 |
58 | G & C Miner Farm Inc | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $168,813 |
59 | Francis Amaral | Oneco, CT 06373 | $167,844 |
60 | Russell Gray | Moosup, CT 06354 | $167,717 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”