Wool and Mohair Programs in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 35
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney) totaled $10,949 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ronald Florence | Stonington, CT 06378 | $1,608 |
2 | Charles F Franklin | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $1,459 |
3 | Mark F Russell | Oakdale, CT 06370 | $1,205 |
4 | Suzanne Sankow | Old Lyme, CT 06371 | $660 |
5 | Doris Kowalyshyn | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $648 |
6 | John De Bruyn Kops | Thompson, CT 06277 | $578 |
7 | Charis A Amalfi | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $388 |
8 | James C Lamb Estate | Ledyard, CT 06339 | $370 |
9 | Muriel Weber | Ledyard, CT 06339 | $350 |
10 | George Molyneux | Old Lyme, CT 06371 | $347 |
11 | Mary Belden | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $325 |
12 | Betsy Japp & Jon Lantman | Eastford, CT 06242 | $271 |
13 | Richard C Hall | Waterford, CT 06385 | $268 |
14 | Sylvia C Murray | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $262 |
15 | William A Cournoyer | Preston, CT 06365 | $219 |
16 | Anna Burnham | North Windham, CT 06256 | $217 |
17 | Sandy Eggers | Danielson, CT 06239 | $194 |
18 | William H Rose III | North Windham, CT 06256 | $189 |
19 | Wychwood Farms | Stonington, CT 06378 | $162 |
20 | Cheryl A Marchand | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $152 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>