Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Florida
(Rep. Matt Gaetz)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Florida (Rep. Matt Gaetz), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 155
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Florida (Rep. Matt Gaetz) totaled $1,463,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Joshua R Luke | Laurel Hill, FL 32567 | $12,284 |
22 | Timothy L Roberts | Jay, FL 32565 | $11,875 |
23 | Rowell/bingham Farms Inc | Jay, FL 32565 | $11,862 |
24 | Ben Ellison | Jay, FL 32565 | $11,778 |
25 | Jerry Jones | Jay, FL 32565 | $11,102 |
26 | Henry Lowry | Jay, FL 32565 | $10,909 |
27 | Kenneth Watson | Jay, FL 32565 | $10,826 |
28 | John Salter Farms | Pace, FL 32571 | $10,633 |
29 | Alan J Edwards | Jay, FL 32565 | $10,444 |
30 | Tfsa Inc | Jay, FL 32565 | $10,418 |
31 | John Robert Evers | Baker, FL 32531 | $10,183 |
32 | W R Hendricks | Jay, FL 32565 | $10,077 |
33 | Millicent Noel | Indialantic, FL 32903 | $10,073 |
34 | John Michael Koehn | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $9,581 |
35 | Sharla J Koehn | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $9,581 |
36 | Mcelhaney Farms | Century, FL 32535 | $9,558 |
37 | H Harris Investments Inc | Jay, FL 32565 | $9,500 |
38 | , | $9,188 | |
39 | Gary Mininger | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $9,139 |
40 | James S Phillips | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $8,844 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”