Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Florida (Rep. Matt Gaetz), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 823
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Florida (Rep. Matt Gaetz) totaled $15,795,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Dickey B Steele | Laurel Hill, FL 32567 | $32,577 |
102 | Sandra Locklin Wolfe | Milton, FL 32570 | $32,304 |
103 | James Odell Hughes | Baker, FL 32531 | $32,276 |
104 | Hudson & Holt Developers Inc | Milton, FL 32570 | $32,230 |
105 | Herbert H Leonard Estate | Mc David, FL 32568 | $31,739 |
106 | Ralph M Hoodless Jr | Huntsville, AL 35801 | $31,579 |
107 | Jim W Hudson | Milton, FL 32570 | $31,535 |
108 | Johnnie M Ragsdale | Forest, MS 39074 | $31,192 |
109 | Walter E Smith Jr | Pensacola, FL 32505 | $31,063 |
110 | Willard B Brown | Pensacola, FL 32514 | $30,592 |
111 | James T Saunders | Crestview, FL 32536 | $30,100 |
112 | R Steven Sasser Farish | Jay, FL 32565 | $29,663 |
113 | Dick C Salter | Pace, FL 32571 | $29,200 |
114 | Velma Mae Dunn | Cantonment, FL 32533 | $29,163 |
115 | Jason Winfred Davis | Laurel Hill, FL 32567 | $28,989 |
116 | Glenn Dotson | Baker, FL 32531 | $28,656 |
117 | Gladys H Hawthorne | Milton, FL 32571 | $28,575 |
118 | James B Hart | Baker, FL 32531 | $28,548 |
119 | Neal Mcfadden | Baker, FL 32531 | $28,459 |
120 | Ronald Rigby | Mc David, FL 32568 | $28,162 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”