Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 2nd District of Florida (Rep. Neal Dunn), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 70

Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 2nd District of Florida (Rep. Neal Dunn) totaled $3,795,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP)
1995-2023
1W Steven WhitedSopchoppy, FL 32358$395,772
2Big River Honey, LLCWewahitchka, FL 32465$326,417
3Bb's Apiaries IncSopchoppy, FL 32358$251,336
4Donald W Harcus SrWewahitchka, FL 32465$229,957
5Robert M MearsAltha, FL 32421$209,168
6L.l. Lanier & Son IncWewahitchka, FL 32465$196,493
7Ronald H MerrittSopchoppy, FL 32358$177,273
8Stingers Honey CompanySopchoppy, FL 32358$169,564
9Langston's Honey IncSopchoppy, FL 32358$162,218
10Sergei Svetleachni Dba Fox Honey FarmDe Pere, WI 54115$159,131
11Stanley G WilsonSopchoppy, FL 32358$151,302
12Linda's Apiaries IncSopchoppy, FL 32358$125,702
13Jacob G WilsonSopchoppy, FL 32358$122,568
14Eli Jim WilsonSopchoppy, FL 32358$110,686
15Black Creek Farm Of Wakulla LLCCrawfordville, FL 32327$77,464
16Bryan K BarkerKinard, FL 32449$65,815
17Bryan Keath BarkerKinard, FL 32449$61,285
18Chipola Apiaries LLCMarianna, FL 32446$60,627
19Richard MaxeyCrawfordville, FL 32327$56,156
20Stanley Travis WilsonSopchoppy, FL 32358$50,520

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag