Farm Subsidy information
11th District of Florida
(Rep. Daniel Webster)
Total Subsidies in 11th District of Florida (Rep. Daniel Webster), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 188
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 11th District of Florida (Rep. Daniel Webster) totaled $1,902,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Doug Lancaster Farms, Inc | Center Hill, FL 33514 | $75,377 |
2 | Jamie L Graham | Webster, FL 33597 | $70,064 |
3 | Wells Family Ent Lllp | Lake Panasoffkee, FL 33538 | $68,142 |
4 | Ventura Ranch LLC | Lake Panasoffkee, FL 33538 | $63,519 |
5 | Sarah T Hensley | Bushnell, FL 33513 | $62,818 |
6 | , | $57,971 | |
7 | Robert Walker | Lakeland, FL 33804 | $55,596 |
8 | Taylor-cade Trees Inc | Bushnell, FL 33513 | $55,237 |
9 | J Bar J Cattle, LLC | Bushnell, FL 33513 | $53,340 |
10 | Eagle Nest Ranch LLC | Tampa, FL 33625 | $50,994 |
11 | Savage Oaks Cattle LLC | Bushnell, FL 33513 | $45,485 |
12 | Andrea M Revels | Webster, FL 33597 | $40,694 |
13 | Marvin Lamar Parker | Webster, FL 33597 | $39,021 |
14 | Jesse D Strickland | Dunnellon, FL 34431 | $37,882 |
15 | Rickey N Rollison | Oxford, FL 34484 | $36,540 |
16 | Jamie D Sanders | Wildwood, FL 34785 | $33,850 |
17 | Jacky D Atchley | Okahumpka, FL 34762 | $31,915 |
18 | Danny Maddox | Center Hill, FL 33514 | $30,576 |
19 | H&m Cattle Company And Investments LLC | Webster, FL 33597 | $29,995 |
20 | Gary W Long | Bushnell, FL 33513 | $29,588 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>