Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,042
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop) totaled $3,883,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Martha A Culpepper Estate | Jonesboro, GA 30236 | $20,302 |
22 | Tall Tine Plantation | Wauchula, FL 33873 | $20,260 |
23 | C G & F Farm Gp | Americus, GA 31709 | $19,989 |
24 | Bragg Properties LLC | Homewood, AL 35209 | $19,595 |
25 | Clifton J Bailey | Tallahassee, FL 32312 | $19,443 |
26 | Ray D Williams | Smithville, GA 31787 | $19,114 |
27 | Eunice White Residuary Tr Guyla D | Blakely, GA 39823 | $17,786 |
28 | Gregory W Suess | Albany, GA 31721 | $17,290 |
29 | Robert Emanuel Dodson | Plains, GA 31780 | $16,963 |
30 | South Georgia Land Co Inc | Americus, GA 31709 | $16,774 |
31 | Carl Roland Satterfield | Americus, GA 31709 | $16,741 |
32 | Julian Nichols | Lumpkin, GA 39840 | $16,586 |
33 | Timbaroo Lllp | Albany, GA 31707 | $16,027 |
34 | J & J Pinelands LLC | Blakely, GA 39823 | $15,792 |
35 | Patricia Farms LLC | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $15,643 |
36 | Henry L Crisp | De Soto, GA 31743 | $15,588 |
37 | Southeastern Leased Farms Inc | Americus, GA 31709 | $14,879 |
38 | Chickasaw Timber Company LLC | Macon, GA 31210 | $14,684 |
39 | W G Mercer Jr | Dawson, GA 39842 | $14,459 |
40 | Betty E Lumpkin Farm LLC | Cuthbert, GA 39840 | $14,444 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”