Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,620
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop) totaled $68,396,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mathis Farm General Partners | Arlington, GA 39813 | $310,192 |
42 | Big Drain Farms | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $286,782 |
43 | Jda Farms | Damascus, GA 39841 | $279,371 |
44 | Ragan Farm Partnership | Edison, GA 39846 | $278,888 |
45 | Curry Farm Partners | Shellman, GA 39886 | $266,088 |
46 | Roger Day & Sons Gp | Brinson, GA 39825 | $256,413 |
47 | Triple S Farms | Iron City, GA 39859 | $255,888 |
48 | Bowen Farms Partnership | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $253,816 |
49 | Shivers And Williams Farm | Fort Gaines, GA 39851 | $244,648 |
50 | Rentz Farms Partnership | Leary, GA 39862 | $242,084 |
51 | Roger Wayne Davis Farms | Blakely, GA 39823 | $241,770 |
52 | Peavy Brothers | Cuthbert, GA 39840 | $231,008 |
53 | 4 Miller Farms | Iron City, GA 39859 | $228,082 |
54 | Jed Daniel Farms Gp | Dawson, GA 39842 | $221,198 |
55 | Isler Farms Partnership | Coleman, GA 39836 | $216,682 |
56 | Bank Of Camilla ** | Camilla, GA 31730 | $215,047 |
57 | Collins Farms | Edison, GA 39846 | $214,828 |
58 | Family Farm Partners | Camilla, GA 31730 | $214,434 |
59 | Goolsby Farms | Dawson, GA 39842 | $206,670 |
60 | G B Alston Farms | Preston, GA 31824 | $203,488 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”