Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Georgia
(Rep. Sanford Bishop)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,602
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop) totaled $19,434,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Big Drain Farms | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $37,410 |
82 | Wilbur Gamble | Dawson, GA 39842 | $36,458 |
83 | Srinivasarao Settipalli Dba Shakti Organic Farms | Midland, GA 31820 | $35,192 |
84 | Jerry Thornton & Elaine Thornton Partners | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $35,184 |
85 | Maxwell Farms LLC | Dawson, GA 39842 | $34,164 |
86 | , | $34,018 | |
87 | Clifton J Bailey | Tallahassee, FL 32312 | $33,458 |
88 | F-n-r Farms Partnership | Brinson, GA 39825 | $32,912 |
89 | Trust U/w Willie Carlton Newberry | Camilla, GA 31730 | $32,717 |
90 | Vicki Lynn Land Company LLC | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $32,093 |
91 | Carl Roland Satterfield | Americus, GA 31709 | $32,028 |
92 | Bowen Farms Partnership | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $31,953 |
93 | Ragan Properties LLC | Edison, GA 39846 | $31,280 |
94 | Riley Davis Farms Partnership | Dawson, GA 39842 | $30,764 |
95 | , | $30,435 | |
96 | Jamar Farms Inc | Dawson, GA 39842 | $30,399 |
97 | Summer Time Melons LLC | Lakeland, FL 33802 | $29,924 |
98 | , | $29,825 | |
99 | Curry Farm Partners | Shellman, GA 39886 | $28,555 |
100 | Theodore C Jacks | Dunnellon, FL 34431 | $28,337 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”